Jury Selection Begins in High-Profile Murder Case Against Dentist James Craig
Jury selection commenced on Monday in the high-profile trial of James Craig, a local dentist accused of poisoning his wife’s protein shakes while conducting a secret affair and planning a life without her.
James Toliver Craig, aged 47, faces first-degree murder charges following the death of his wife, Angela Craig, 43, in March 2023. The autopsy revealed she died from lethal amounts of cyanide and tetrahydrozoline.
Defense attorney Kelly Hyman has outlined key challenges anticipated in the courtroom as the murder trial progresses.
Under the guidance of defense lawyer Lisa Fine Moses, Craig’s legal team has already filed two critical motions: one to suppress electronic evidence and another to have the charges dismissed. These motions are expected to shape the upcoming legal battles.
"Evidence is pivotal in any case, and motions to suppress and dismissal are standard in criminal proceedings,” Hyman noted.
A motion to suppress seeks to prevent the introduction of certain evidence that the defense claims was obtained unlawfully or in violation of constitutional rights.
Central to the prosecution’s argument is Craig’s alleged utilization of a work computer.
Authorities revealed in court documents that a suspected secret email account was located solely on a clinic computer in dental exam room No. 9, absent from his personal devices or that of Angela’s.
Investigators contend that prior to Angela’s hospitalization and subsequent death, Craig used the dental office’s computer to conduct searches for “undetectable poisons” and methods to acquire them; he later ordered arsenic and cyanide online, along with queries on lethal dosages of arsenic and its detectability in autopsies.
Additionally, it is claimed that Craig made YouTube searches including “how to make poison” and “Top 5 Undetectable Poisons That Show No Signs of Foul Play.”
“The defense asserts that these computer searches exceeded the parameters of the search warrant,” Hyman commented. “Nevertheless, the judge has denied previous motions to suppress this evidence.”
While the defense challenges the admissibility of various pieces of electronic evidence—such as recordings between Craig and his alleged lover—Hyman cautioned that the confrontation over forensic evidence could prove critical.
She indicated that court will likely conduct "gatekeeping" hearings regarding the admissibility of scientific evidence, including toxicology and digital forensics, as per Colorado’s interpretation of the Daubert standard.
The defense will meticulously examine chain-of-custody documentation and adherence to lab accreditation standards throughout the proceedings.
Hyman further discussed how pretrial media coverage may influence plea discussions. Prosecutors often adopt a firmer posture to avoid appearing weak, while defendants might threaten changes in venue or jury sequestration to pursue more favorable agreements.
"In such cases," she explained, "the key pressure point arises when both parties realize that the potential jurors might have been influenced by media narratives.”
As jury selection progresses, Hyman emphasized the importance of voir dire to delve into jurors’ media consumption and personal perspectives on law enforcement.
“You can’t take for granted that someone who claims to be unbiased hasn’t encountered a viral headline and formed a judgment,” she stated.
Fox News Digital has sought a response from Lisa Fine Moses regarding the developments.
Passionate journalist and digital news editor with a keen eye for global affairs and emerging trends. As the founder and lead writer of RSS News US, he is dedicated to delivering accurate, insightful, and engaging content to readers seeking trustworthy news in a fast-paced world.
